Something went wrong
Try again later.
Doctors Herbert West and Dan Cain discover the secret to creating human life and proceed to create a perfect woman from dead tissue. And the bride is unleashed upon her mate in a climax of sensual horror.
19 September 1929, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
21 December 1964, Buenos Aires, Argentina
19 February 1960, Evanston, Illinois, USA
20 October 1973, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
9 September 1954, Oxnard, California, USA
2 October 1936, Wimbledon, England, UK
15 December 1944, Brooklyn, New York, USA
3 October 1949, San Fernando, California, USA
28 July 1954, Portland, Oregon, USA
3 February 1965, Los Angeles, California, USA
August 21, 2009
Absolutely tasteless, glorious, gory fun with special effects from a crew of specialists who have, as one critic wrote, just gone abracadaver.August 30, 2004
Less a sequel to the critically praised 1985 horror film Re-Animator than a rehash based on the same H. P. Lovecraft stories.January 01, 2000
Brian Yusna has replaced Stuart Gordon in the director's chair, without bringing new life to the affair. Even the jokes in the Woody Keith/Rick Fry screenplay seem refried, suggesting that all too much of this Bride is old and borrowed...March 26, 2009
The over-the-top acting that Gordon encouraged in Re-Animator is continued here with Combs particularly adept at the darkly comic throwaway line.April 11, 2016
"This is a largely uninspired rehash which fails to improve upon the superior original, stuttering along until the demented, anything goes finale."October 22, 2003
While Re-Animator has wit and audacity and gore and ferocity to spare, Bride of Re-Animator has gore... and the same actors.September 07, 2003
not particularly scaryOctober 31, 2003
If it lacks the intimate cohesion of the first film despite its desire to resurrect a feeling of doomed love, it at least isn't coy about ladling out the goodies.January 29, 2008
Could have been better but still a fine sequel.June 24, 2006
The excessive blood-spurting gruesomeness and cartoonish stop-motion effects trivialise the horror and undercut the would-be black humour in this travestied sequel to Stuart Gordon's hugely enjoyable film.August 21, 2009
It can't come up with any really great plot points that weren't covered in the original, so it rehashes them to a boring degree.