An action-adventures movie that recounts the biography of Alexander, the historical army leader who is considered to be the greatest leader ever. During his rule, the country exposed to many attacks, he doesn't only manage to defend it but also he has managed to achieve great success by opening many other cities and countries.
27 July 1977, Dublin, Ireland
11 May 1976, Beaumont, Puy-de-Dôme, France
13 October 1965, New York City, New York, USA
14 November 1974, Bronx, New York, USA
11 July 1990, New York City, New York, USA
19 July 1970, Guildford, Surrey, England, UK
15 September 1946, New York City, New York, USA
30 May 1979, Dublin, Ireland
9 November 1968, Istanbul, Turkey
4 June 1975, Los Angeles, California, USA
1976, Gorey, County Wexford, Ireland
26 December 1971, Bossier City, Louisiana, USA
1983, Bolton-le-Sands, Lancashire, England, UK
3 March 1965, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
9 May 1979, New York City, New York, USA
June 02, 2014
This new set presents the film in great quality and comes with some fantastic special features, but it's doubtful that this latest version of "Alexander" is going to change anyone's mind as to the quality of the film itself.December 10, 2004
A lunk-headed train wreck that looks like a tag sale in a 323 B.C. supermarket in old Peking.December 10, 2004
At a reported cost of $155 million, Alexander qualifies as a super-spectacle in every respect but one -- namely in its neurotic, confused and sexually ambidextrous hero.September 26, 2005
By summoning his inner classicist, [director] Stone has made an excruciating disaster for the ages.November 30, 2004
Sluggish, unsmiling, and almost as limp as the feather fans with which our heroes are gently aerated on their trip to the Hanging Gardens of Babylon.May 01, 2010
General mistakes all across the board contribute and reinforce each other to bring it downApril 29, 2009
This is ultimately "Alexander" as written by Danielle Steele...September 09, 2010
Alexander the person was great. This movie isn't.February 09, 2011
For the lucky few that see this without ever having viewed the first cut, they may wonder what all the criticism was about in the first place.April 15, 2009
Stone doesn't present characters that the audience can believe in, even for one moment, as representative of their historic roles.March 06, 2005
Though the battles have the blood-and-sinew bravado you expect from Oliver Stone, this three-hour buttnumbathon is hamstrung by a hectoring grandiosity, not new to Stone, and a nod toward caution, which is.November 30, 2004
It's just a wild, glorious, wacky mess that I found really entertaining.